Applied Information Research  |  Dissertation  |  FILE  | NESHA-IL Project | IL Research
Blogs Dictionary Online survey ilit.org home mail: ilit@ilit.org   FILE links FILE Blog FILE Session 3: 11.00-1.00 Andrew Booth Delivery of the group-based presentations on an audience profile and the type of information, support required/expected from the information professionals. This is followed by peer-led evaluation of the group-presentations to inform Component 2 Self and Peer-based feedback and evaluation - based on the following criteria: Content Knowledge of the audience Appropriateness of the learning outcomes (ie are these measurable? too many?) assessment (ie is this mapped onto the learning objectives? is it set at the appropriate level?) Presentation Effectiveness of communication Eye contact and rapport with the local audience Voice projection Pacing of delivery Effective use of slides Clear design Timing NHS Users' Profiles (Word file) Recommended reading: Booth, A. Where is the harm in EBLIP? Current perspectives, future developments. Journal of the European Association for Health Information Libraries, 2 (3), August 2006: 34-41 (Large file: 7Mb) Deep and surface learning (Word file) FILE 2007 Andrew Booth, Reader in Evidence Based Information Practice, ScHARR, University of Sheffield. Information literacy skills training (Powerpoint file) "The Chief Executive has just proposed that all information skills training in your organisation be scrapped and staff spend their time on more productive activities instead. What ONE line of argument/piece of evidence would you use to justify the continuation of this service?" Please record your answer in writing (a single bulletpoint of around 50 words) ready for this session. Podcast of Andrew Booth's talk (this file will start playing as soon as it is selected) Group-based presentations for Component 2 are available from the 2007 and 2008 e-portfolios   Site updated January 3, 2009 All content © Susie Andretta 2000-2009